However, it doesn't mean that leaders or those in power can't look back on past actions by previous administrations and decide to take advantage of laws, treaties, partnerships, agreements, or executive orders passed.
For instance, through the Security and Prosperity Partnership, the nations of Mexico, Canada, and the United States have "volunteered" their military forces in the event of a national emergency in any of the three countries. Mind you, this is not a formal treaty. It has no congressional oversight, and Congress has never authorized it. No, the SPP is a "dialogue" between the three countries. (Now what a "dialogue" is and how it's different from a formal treaty is obviously above my paygrade, because this thing looks like a treaty to me...)
And it wouldn't take something like a civil war to call on these other nations for assistance. No, now, through executive orders, the president has the authority to declare a national emergency if, for instance, he feels the Internet is being compromised. (And that's just one scenario.) Of course the definition of "compromised" is left up to those in power, so by definition "compromised" means whatever they want it to mean.
Now, take that a step further. The president has just used his authority to activate an Internet "kill" switch. Millions of people are instantly out of work. People are getting angry, and they want some answers. Without the Internet, computers, supply systems, transportation systems--everything is useless. People are tired of being manipulated by their government, and they're not taking it anymore. That's when the president calls upon that "dialogue" his predecessor had with Mexico and Canada, and before you know it, you've got foreign troops enforcing martial law in your city.
It doesn't even have to be an Internet kill switch scenario. How about mass panic because of a perceived "pandemic?" (Can anyone say H1N1?) How about any number of things? The president has the power, because of the actions of previous administrations, to define what "is" is ... and there is not one blessed thing Congress can do about it for six months. That's right--they can't even contest it to the judicial branch.
This whole thing sounds a little far-fetched, doesn't it? Well, how about this from the Daily Paul Liberty Forum from 2008?
On February 14, at the U.S. Army North headquarters, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, U.S. Air Force Gen. Gene Renuart, commander of North American Aerospace Defense Command and U.S. Northern Command, and Canadian Air Force Lt.-Gen. Marc Dumais, commander of Canada Command, signed "a Civil Assistance Plan that allows the military from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a civil emergency," according to the USNORTHCOM website. Billed as a "bilateral military plan" to align U.S. and Canadian "national military plans to respond quickly to ... requests for military support of civil authorities," the plan represents nothing short of a merging of national military infrastructures under the aegis of the North American Union. |
The Department of Justice held the first in what is expected to be a series of meetings on Tuesday afternoon with a group of stakeholders in the ongoing gun-policy debates....officials said part of the discussion was expected to center around the White House's options for shaping policy on its own or through its adjoining agencies and departments....Administration officials said talk of executive orders or agency action are among a host of options that President Barack Obama and his advisers are considering. |
Guns are for more than self-protection. Guns also allow us to hunt and feed ourselves if we so choose. That the United States government would feel that we should not be allowed that constitutional right is mind-boggling. And when honest citizens no longer have access to weapons, that means the criminal element will be free to prey on whomever they choose.
Is there anything you can do to hide your guns so that in the event of a total societal collapse you can at least feed your family and protect them? How can you:
- Hide your guns so the criminals won't be able to find them?
- Create hiding places right in plain sight, with no one the wiser?
- Have the right security system to protect against home invasion?
- Decide which room is the most important room in the house to protect your family and your guns?
In this manual, you'll learn:
- The four different types of caches you need to consider
- How much money to put in your survival cache
- The 29 items you need in a medical cache
- And the best materials for building all these survival caches
For instance:
- How do you choose a place that even metal detectors can't find?
- How do you evaluate a site for its long-term suitability?
- How do you protect your cache from humidity and moisture?
- How do you remember where you put all this stuff?
Included in this offer is a 2-part CD set titled The Great Gun Debate: How to Argue With Liberals About Guns and Win Everytime! It's a free bonus when you order Hide Your Guns. But wait! That's not all! Also included is a free bonus DVD titled The Real Story Behind the Second Amendment. It details the REAL reasons the Founders included the Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights.
That's a pretty good deal, wouldn't you say? But there's still one more free gift. The No B.S. Home Defense With Firearms ebook. This 16-page ebook details how to use firearms to protect you and your family against those who wish to do you harm. It's not just for the novice gun-owner; it's a great teaching tool to use with your kids as well.
Frankly, I haven't seen a package this detailed anywhere. If you're serious about protecting your family, about being able to provide for them in the event of an economic tsunami, then you need this book Hide Your Guns. Click HERE